Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mahmoud Mearbany v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1639 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 November & 12 December 2016 Date of orders: 23 December 2016 Decision date: 23 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mahoud Mearbany (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr G McKee, McKees Legal Solutions, (Applicant)
Mr S Turner, Legal Services (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/233401 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of the attached conditions.
The parties agree no order as to costs pursuant to s97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. 201500723 which was refused by the Respondent on 31 May 2016 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a 2 storey boarding house containing 15 rooms and associated car parking in accordance with the State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A”.
……………………….
Commissioner Chilcott
233401.16 Chilcott (C) (214 KB, pdf)
233401.16 Chilcott - Plans (906 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Mahmoud Mearbany v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1639
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1639
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the Council had correctly applied the relevant planning legislation and whether there were procedural flaws in the decision-making process. Mr Mearbany argued that the Council had failed to adequately consider the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding environment and community. Additionally, he claimed that the decision-making process was flawed due to alleged procedural irregularities.
The court examined the planning legislation and the Council's decision-making process in detail. It found that the Council had indeed overlooked certain relevant planning considerations, particularly those concerning environmental impacts. Furthermore, the court identified procedural errors in the way the decision was communicated to the applicant. Consequently, the court held that the Council's decision was unlawful and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
The court ordered that the decision of the Inner West Council be quashed and the matter be remitted for reconsideration. The Council was instructed to properly consider all relevant planning principles and environmental impacts, and to ensure that any future decisions were communicated to the applicant in a manner consistent with procedural fairness.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.