[2013] FWCA 9363 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Macmahon Mining Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/11550)
MACMAHON MINING SERVICES LONSDALE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 29 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Macmahon Mining Services Lonsdale Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Macmahon Mining Services Lonsdale Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Macmahon Mining Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 December 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405606 PR545101>
- AGLC
- Macmahon Mining Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 9363
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9363
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the agreement satisfied the statutory requirement that employees be "better off overall" under section 172 of the Fair Work Act. This required the Commission to consider whether the agreement provided employees with a package of terms and conditions that was, on balance, no worse than their existing terms and conditions. The Commission needed to assess both the financial and non-financial aspects of the proposed agreement. The second issue was whether any adverse financial impacts were outweighed by improved non-financial terms and conditions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Macmahon Mining Services Lonsdale Agreement 2013 did meet the "better off overall test". The Commission noted that while there were some financial reductions, these were offset by substantial non-financial benefits, such as improved work-life balance and job security provisions. The overall package, when considering both financial and non-financial aspects, provided employees with a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.