| [2019] FWCA 5986 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Item 16 Sch. 3—Termination of transitional instrument
Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3139)
MACMAHON CONTRACTORS CONSTRUCTION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2007
Mining industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 4 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for termination of the Macmahon Contractors Construction Collective Agreement 2007.
[1] On 23 August 2019, Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd (Applicant) applied pursuant to Schedule 3, Item 16 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (Transitional Act) to terminate the Macmahon Contractors Construction Collective Agreement 2007 (Agreement) (Application).
[2] The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument to which Item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act applies. The effect of Item 16 is that the termination of agreement provisions found in Subdivision D of Division 7 - Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies to the Agreement as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument.
[3] Sections 225 and 226 of the Act provide:
225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
[4] The Agreement covers the operations of the Applicant’s ‘Construction Division’ and any seconded, subsidiary, joint venture, successor, assignee or transmittee businesses engaged in civil construction and maintenance work. Ms Victoria Bucknell, HR Superintendent of the Applicant, submitted a statutory declaration in support of the Application in which she outlined that the Applicant is no longer in the business of earthworks and infrastructure solutions in civil construction and maintenance work, but rather is a mining contractor business now. Ms Bucknell also submitted that there were no employees employed under this scope of work.
[5] No employee organisations are covered by the Agreement.
[6] I note that this Agreement was approved by the former Workplace Authority under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (WR Act). The Actcame into force, and superseded the WR Act on 1 July 2009. According to s 352(1)(b) of the WR Act, the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement such as the Agreement, is no later than the fifth anniversary of the date the agreement was lodged. Therefore, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement has inevitably passed.
[7] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration of the Applicant filed with the Application, I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in ss 226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AC308026 PR711774>
- AGLC
- Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5986
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 5986
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the changes in the industry were significant enough to warrant the termination of the collective agreement, and whether such termination was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission examined the evidence presented by both parties regarding the nature and extent of the changes in the industry, and the impact of these changes on the employees' working conditions and terms. The Commission also considered whether there were alternative methods to address the issues without terminating the agreement, such as negotiating amendments.
The Commission found that while there had been significant changes in the industry, these changes did not necessarily render the existing agreement inappropriate or obsolete. The Commission noted that the agreement had provisions for flexibility and adaptation to changes in working practices. The evidence did not demonstrate that the changes were so substantial that they could not be managed through negotiation or amendment of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission decided that the application for termination should be dismissed. The Commission also emphasised the importance of maintaining stable and fair working conditions for employees, particularly in industries subject to rapid change.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the application for termination of the Macmahon Contractors Construction Collective Agreement 2007 be dismissed. The Commission encouraged both parties to engage in further negotiations to address any issues arising from the changes in the industry, with the aim of reaching a mutually beneficial outcome. The Commission highlighted the importance of maintaining good faith and cooperative approaches in industrial relations, and the role of collective agreements in providing a framework for fair and stable working conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.