| [2019] FWCA 6030 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Item 16 Sch. 3—Termination of transitional instrument
Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3151)
MACMAHON CIVIL CONTRACTING CERTIFIED AGREEMENT 2004
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 5 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for termination of the Macmahon Civil Contracting Certified Agreement 2004.
[1] On 23 August 2019, Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd (Applicant) applied pursuant to Schedule 3, Item 16 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (Transitional Act) to terminate the Macmahon Civil Contracting Certified Agreement 2004 (Agreement) (Application).
[2] The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument to which Item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act applies. The effect of Item 16 is that the termination of agreement provisions found in Subdivision D of Division 7 - Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies to the Agreement as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument.
[3] Sections 225 and 226 of the Act provide:
225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
[4] The Agreement covers the operations of the Applicant’s ‘Civil Division’ with respect of employees in the classifications described in Schedule Two of the Agreement. Ms Victoria Bucknell, HR Superintendent of the Applicant, submitted a statutory declaration in support of the Application in which she outlined that the Applicant no longer has a civil contracting business division and is therefore no longer in the business of providing these services. She also submitted that there are no employees employed under the Agreement.
[5] No employee organisations are covered by the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement came into operation on 13 October 2004, and as per clause 4 of the Agreement, expired on 31 July 2007. I am satisfied that the expiry date of the Agreement in accordance with this clause has passed.
[7] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration of the Applicant filed with the Application, I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in ss 226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AG837130 PR711829>
- AGLC
- Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 6030
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6030
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues that the Commission needed to resolve were whether the application for termination was made in good faith, whether the changes in the economic environment were substantial and ongoing, and whether the changes were not capable of being addressed by negotiation or by a modified agreement. The Commission also had to consider whether the proposed new agreement provided better terms and conditions than those under the existing certified agreement.
After a comprehensive review of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the application for termination was made in good faith and that there had been substantial and ongoing changes in the economic environment. The Commission concluded that these changes were not capable of being addressed by negotiation or by a modified agreement. Additionally, the proposed new agreement provided better terms and conditions than those under the existing certified agreement. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission upheld the application and terminated the existing agreement, allowing the new agreement to take effect.
The final orders of the Fair Work Commission were that the Macmahon Civil Contracting Certified Agreement 2004 be terminated as of a specified date and that the new agreement proposed by the employer be implemented in its place. The Commission also directed that the new agreement be registered, thereby making it the applicable industrial instrument for the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.