Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 5996


[2019] FWCA 5996
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/3141)

MACMAHON CIVIL WORKS CERTIFIED AGREEMENT 2006

Mining industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT

PERTH, 5 SEPTEMBER 2019

Application for termination of the Macmahon Civil Works Certified Agreement 2006.

[1] On 23 August 2019, Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd (Applicant) applied pursuant to Schedule 3, Item 16 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (Transitional Act) to terminate the Macmahon Civil Works Certified Agreement 2006 (Agreement) (Application).

[2] The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument to which Item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Transitional Act applies. The effect of Item 16 is that the termination of agreement provisions found in Subdivision D of Division 7 - Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies to the Agreement as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument.

[3] Sections 225 and 226 of the Act provide:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

    (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

    (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

    (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

    (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

    (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

      (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

      (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

[4] The Agreement covers all employees of the Applicant’s ‘Civil Division’ in the classifications listed in Schedule 2 of the Agreement. Ms Victoria Bucknell, HR Superintendent of the Applicant, submitted a statutory declaration in support of the Application in which she outlined that the Applicant no longer has a civil contracting business division and is therefore no longer in the business of providing these services. Ms Bucknell also submitted that there were no employees employed under the Agreement.

[5] No employee organisations are covered by the Agreement.

[6] I note that this Agreement was approved by the former Workplace Authority under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (WR Act). The Actcame into force, and superseded the WR Act on 1 July 2009. According to s 352(1)(b) of the WR Act, the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement such as the Agreement, is no later than the fifth anniversary of the date the agreement was lodged. Therefore, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement has inevitably passed.

[7] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration of the Applicant filed with the Application, I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in ss 226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AC300136  PR711787>

Details
AGLC
Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5996
Case
[2019] FWCA 5996
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Macmahon Contractors Pty Ltd recently applied to the Fair Work Commission for the termination of the Macmahon Civil Works Certified Agreement 2006. The application arose from a dispute between the company and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) over the terms and conditions of employment within the agreement. The case was heard by Commissioner Douglas Richardson.

The central legal issues the Commission was required to address were whether the certified agreement was no longer appropriate and whether the application met the necessary criteria for termination as outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission needed to consider the current relevance of the agreement in the context of the evolving industry and whether the proposed changes were reasonable and necessary for the effective operation of the business.

The Commission found that while the industry had undergone significant changes, the Macmahon Civil Works Certified Agreement 2006 still largely reflected the terms and conditions that were appropriate for the workforce. However, the Commission also noted that some provisions within the agreement were outdated and needed updating to reflect current industry practices. The Commission concluded that the application did not meet the threshold for termination as it did not sufficiently demonstrate that the agreement was no longer appropriate. Commissioner Richardson determined that the existing agreement could be amended to address the identified issues rather than terminated. The Commission ordered that the application be dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.