[2013] FWCA 4901 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mackay Sugar Limited
(AG2013/7131)
MACKAY SUGAR LIMITED, MOSSMAN SUGAR MILL ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT, NO.10
Sugar industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 19 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Mackay Sugar Limited, Mossman Sugar Mill Enterprise Bargaining Agreement, No.10.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mackay Sugar Limited, Mossman Sugar Mill Enterprise Bargaining Agreement, No.10 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Mackay Sugar Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that the organisations want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402528 PR539181>
- AGLC
- Mackay Sugar Limited [2013] FWCA 4901
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4901
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the proposed agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Specifically, the court needed to ensure that the agreement met the requirements for genuine bargaining, did not discriminate unfairly, and did not contain provisions that were contrary to public policy or industrial relations principles. The court also had to consider whether the agreement provided for the protection of employees' rights and interests.
The court examined the proposed agreement in detail, taking into account submissions from both parties. It considered whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties, whether it contained provisions that were necessary for the protection of employees, and whether it complied with the relevant legislative requirements. After careful consideration, the court found that the proposed agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. The agreement was found to be genuinely negotiated, contained appropriate protections for employees, and complied with the relevant legislation. The court approved the agreement, and the decision was finalised with the issuance of the necessary orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.