[2013] FWCA 7943 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Macedon Ranges Shire Council
(AG2013/10652)
MACEDON RANGES SHIRE COUNCIL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Local government administration | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH | MELBOURNE, 10 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Macedon Ranges Shire Council Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Macedon Ranges Shire Council Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by theMacedon Ranges Shire Council. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code AH, AE404692 PR543117>
- AGLC
- Macedon Ranges Shire Council [2013] FWCA 7943
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7943
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the Enterprise Agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement provided for a safety net of minimum wages and conditions, facilitated flexibility and mobility in the workforce, and did not undermine the right of employees to be represented by a union. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure the agreement was fair and reasonable in all its terms.
In its decision, the Commission found that the Enterprise Agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. The agreement provided a comprehensive safety net of minimum wages and conditions, while also allowing for some flexibility in the workforce. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not undermine the right of employees to be represented by a union and was fair and reasonable in all its terms. Therefore, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, subject to certain conditions.
The Commission ordered that the Enterprise Agreement be registered and become legally binding on the parties, with certain modifications to address the issues raised during the hearing. The modifications related to the calculation of penalty rates for certain employees and the provision of additional leave entitlements. The Commission also directed the parties to review and update specific provisions of the agreement within a specified timeframe to ensure ongoing compliance with relevant laws.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.