MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 8147

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9663)

MACDONALD JOHNSTON - VICTORIAN SERVICE BRANCH - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Manufacturing and associated industries
COMMISSIONER RYAN	MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2013

Application for approval of the MacDonald Johnston - Victorian Service Branch - Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MacDonald Johnston - Victorian Service Branch - Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] An undertaking has been given in relation to clauses 17(d) and 17(e) of the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(1) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 24 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

APPENDIX A

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd involved the application for the approval of the MacDonald Johnston - Victorian Service Branch - Enterprise Agreement 2013. The matter was brought before the Fair Work Commission, which was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary legal criteria for approval. The dispute centred around the provisions of the agreement that pertained to the terms and conditions of employment for the employees under the Victorian Service Branch of MacDonald Johnston.

The legal issues that the Commission had to resolve included whether the enterprise agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether it contained the required minimum terms and conditions, and if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The central contention was whether the agreement provided a fair and effective means for resolving the terms and conditions of employment between the employer and the employees.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission considered the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and the interests of the employees. The Commission found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions. It also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and complied with the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided a fair and effective means for resolving the employment terms and conditions, thus granting approval of the MacDonald Johnston - Victorian Service Branch - Enterprise Agreement 2013.

MacDonald Johnston Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established