M v Department of Communities and Justice; M v Family and Community Services

Case

[2023] NSWDC 485

23 October 2023


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
M v Department of Communities and Justice; M v Family and Community Services [2023] NSWDC 485 [2023] NSWDC 485 23 October 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of M v Department of Communities and Justice; M v Family and Community Services, the plaintiff sought an extension of time to appeal against orders of the Children’s Court made pursuant to the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW). The appeal concerned the care and protection orders made over a child, and the plaintiff argued that the orders were not in the child’s best interests. The court had to consider whether the plaintiff’s delay in appealing was inordinate, whether the plaintiff’s explanation for the delay was adequate, and whether extending the time to appeal would be prejudicial to the child or contrary to the child’s best interests.

The central legal issues the court needed to address included the extent of the plaintiff’s delay in lodging the appeal, the adequacy of the reasons provided for this delay, and the potential impact of the extension on the child’s welfare. The court examined whether the plaintiff had a fairly arguable appeal and whether granting the extension would prejudice the child or be otherwise contrary to the child’s best interests. The court also had to consider the statutory provisions under ss 90 and 90A of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) that governed the extension of time for appeals in such cases.

The court found that the plaintiff's delay in appealing was inordinate and the explanation provided was not adequate. The plaintiff did not demonstrate that the appeal was fairly arguable or that the extension would not be prejudicial to the child. Consequently, the court dismissed the summons for leave to appeal and the amended summons for leave to appeal, holding that extending the time to appeal was not warranted under the circumstances. The court concluded that granting the extension would not serve the best interests of the child and was therefore not appropriate. The appeal was dismissed, and no further orders were made.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Limitation Periods

  • Best Interests of the Child