Lyon and Kelsey
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 1246
•2 July 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lyon and Kelsey [2015] FCCA 1246
[2015] FCCA 1246
2 July 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this matter before Judge Monahan, the court considered parenting orders concerning a child named X. The dispute involved the arrangements for X's living arrangements and time spent with each parent.
The court was required to determine the specific orders regarding X's parental responsibility, where X would live, and the schedule for X to spend time with the father. Additionally, the court needed to address communication protocols between the parents, the use of social media in relation to X, and arrangements for X's education and extracurricular activities.
The court ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders concerning X. It established equal shared parental responsibility for X, with X to live with the mother. The father was granted specific time with X, detailed in a complex four-week cycle that evolved over several years, with provisions for school terms and holidays in the Australian Capital Territory. Further orders addressed communication, including telephone and internet contact, the use of a communication book, and restrictions on social media postings. The court also made orders regarding X's childcare and schooling, requiring both parents to engage in specific parenting programs and first aid courses. Provisions were also made for dispute resolution and the father's contribution to the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
The court was required to determine the specific orders regarding X's parental responsibility, where X would live, and the schedule for X to spend time with the father. Additionally, the court needed to address communication protocols between the parents, the use of social media in relation to X, and arrangements for X's education and extracurricular activities.
The court ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders concerning X. It established equal shared parental responsibility for X, with X to live with the mother. The father was granted specific time with X, detailed in a complex four-week cycle that evolved over several years, with provisions for school terms and holidays in the Australian Capital Territory. Further orders addressed communication, including telephone and internet contact, the use of a communication book, and restrictions on social media postings. The court also made orders regarding X's childcare and schooling, requiring both parents to engage in specific parenting programs and first aid courses. Provisions were also made for dispute resolution and the father's contribution to the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Lyon and Kelsey [2015] FCCA 1246
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
3
Lindell & Ranteri
[2010] FamCA 52
Kest & Olsson
[2012] FamCA 148