| [2018] FWCA 917 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 15 - Application by agreement to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
Lynton Surveys Pty Ltd
(AG2017/6552)
LYNTON SURVEYS PTY LTD WORKPLACE AGREEMENT
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 13 FEBRUARY 2018 |
Application for termination of the Lynton Surveys Pty Ltd Workplace Agreement.
An application has been made under Schedule 3, Item 15 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 and s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Lynton Surveys Pty Ltd Workplace Agreement (the Agreement).
[2] Section 226 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[3] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.226 for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date have been met.
[4] The termination of the Agreement is approved with effect from 13 February 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AC317527 PR600333>
- AGLC
- Lynton Surveys Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 917
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 917
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission considered the arguments from both parties and examined the evidence presented regarding the reorganisation and the changes to the workplace agreement. The Commission found that the employer had not adequately justified the changes to the workplace agreement and that the applicant's role had changed significantly without proper consultation. The Commission also noted that the employer had not followed the correct process for terminating the workplace agreement. As a result, the Commission decided that the application for termination of the workplace agreement should be dismissed.
The Commission ordered that the workplace agreement remain in effect, and that the employer and the applicant should engage in further discussions to address the issues raised in the application. The employer was also ordered to compensate the applicant for the time and expenses incurred in relation to the application. This decision highlights the importance of following proper processes when seeking to terminate a workplace agreement and the need for employers to consult with employees regarding any significant changes to their roles or responsibilities.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.