LYNCH and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Case
•
[2016] WASAT 8
•10 FEBRUARY 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
LYNCH and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2016] WASAT 8
[2016] WASAT 8
10 FEBRUARY 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Lynch and Commissioner of Police, the applicant, a police prosecutor, was transferred from Fremantle to Perth. The applicant claimed this was direct discrimination based on an impairment. The High Court of Australia heard the matter. The key issue for the court was whether the comparator, against whom the applicant's treatment was assessed, should have been a full-time or part-time police prosecutor. The resolution of this issue depended on the facts of the case, and it was necessary to determine whether the applicant's treatment was less favourable than that of a comparator in similar circumstances. The court found that the comparator should be a full-time police prosecutor, as the part-time nature of the applicant's role did not place her in materially similar circumstances to full-time prosecutors. Consequently, the court dismissed the complaint of direct discrimination. The orders of the court were that the complaint was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Discrimination
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Breach of Contract
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
FITZGERALD and MERCEDES GROUP PTY LTD [2024] WASAT 33 (S)
Cases Citing This Decision
6
FITZGERALD and MERCEDES GROUP PTY LTD
[2024] WASAT 33 (S)
LYNCH and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
[2016] WASAT 8 (S)
Harvey and Evertop Investments Pty Ltd and ANOR
[2016] WASAT 10
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
1
Li v Edith Cowan University [No 3]
[2013] WASCA 277
WILLIAMS and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
[2005] WASAT 349
CARLISLE and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
[2012] WASAT 90