| [2020] FWCA 2828 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Lympack Pty Ltd T/A LeadAir Ductwork Services
(AG2020/1380)
LYMPACK PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020 – 2024
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 1 JUNE 2020 |
Application for approval of the Lympack Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 - 2024.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lympack Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 - 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Lympack Pty Ltd T/A LeadAir Ductwork Services. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 June 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE508174 PR719769>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Lympack Pty Ltd T/A LeadAir Ductwork Services [2020] FWCA 2828
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 2828
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement provided for appropriate terms and conditions for employees, including minimum pay rates, penalty rates, and other employment conditions. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement complied with the requirements for good faith bargaining and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.
In its decision, the Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not adequately provide for appropriate pay rates and conditions for employees. The Commission noted that the agreement did not provide for minimum pay rates that were commensurate with the skills and responsibilities of the employees, and that it did not provide for adequate penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work. The Commission also found that the agreement did not adequately address issues such as leave entitlements and termination of employment. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act and refused to approve it.
The Commission's decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide for appropriate terms and conditions for employees. Employers and unions must ensure that any proposed agreement meets the requirements of the Fair Work Act and provides for adequate pay rates and conditions for employees. Failure to do so may result in the agreement being refused approval by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.