[2015] FWCA 8827
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.210—Enterprise agreement |
Lutwyche Windsor Kindergarten & Preschool Association Incorporated
(AG2015/7006)
LUTWYCHE WINDSOR KINDERGARTEN & PRESCHOOL EARLY
CHILDHOOD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Educational services
| COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 30 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for variation of the Lutwyche Windsor Kindergarten & Preschool Early
Childhood Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement
known as the Lutwyche Windsor Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Enterprise
Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work
Act 2009 (Act) by Lutwyche Windsor Kindergarten & Preschool Association Incorporated.
[2] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this
application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act,
will operate on and from 23 December 2015.
[5] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE412136 PR575297>
[2015] FWCA 8827
[2015] FWCA 8827
- AGLC
- Lutwyche Windsor Kindergarten & Preschool Association Incorporated - LUTWYCHE WINDSOR KINDERGARTEN & PRESCHOOL EARLY [[2015]] FWCA 8827
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8827
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were justifiable and whether they complied with the relevant legislative framework. Key considerations included the necessity of the proposed changes, their fairness to both the employer and the employees, and whether they adhered to the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. The association argued that the variations were essential for maintaining high-quality early childhood education and for addressing current operational challenges.
In its decision, the court thoroughly examined the evidence presented by both parties. It found that the proposed changes were indeed necessary to support the institution's educational objectives and to address certain operational concerns. The court concluded that the variations were fair and reasonable and did not contravene the principles of the Fair Work Act. As a result, the application for variation was approved, allowing the association to implement the changes as sought.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.