[2013] FWCA 8712 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Luturn Pty Ltd T/A Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir
(AG2013/11155)
MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT PRIMO PORT WAKEFIELD ABATTOIR
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 8 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Maintenance Enterprise Agreement Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Maintenance Enterprise Agreement Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Luturn Pty Ltd T/A Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The employer has provided undertakings in the following terms:
“Luturn Pty Ltd, trading as Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir hereby gives an undertaking
that annual leave entitlements for employees who are regularly rostered to work over seven days of the week will be paid according to the National Employment Standards.
that redundancy payments consistent with the National Employment Standards will be applied to this agreement in the event of redundancy.”
[3] As a result, the above undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A full copy of advice provided by the employer is attached to the Agreement as Attachment A.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405195 PR544190>
- AGLC
- Luturn Pty Ltd T/A Primo Port Wakefield Abattoir [2013] FWCA 8712
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8712
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, including the requirement for the agreement to meet the "better off overall test" and to cover a range of mandatory topics. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for a fair and effective means of resolving workplace disputes and provided for the proper administration of the agreement. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements, including the need for genuine bargaining and proper consultation with relevant employee representatives.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence and submissions provided by the parties and conducted an independent assessment of the proposed agreement. The Commission found that the proposed agreement met the legal requirements for an enterprise agreement and provided for a fair and effective means of resolving workplace disputes. The Commission also found that the agreement complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements, including genuine bargaining and proper consultation with relevant employee representatives. As a result, the Commission approved the proposed agreement, subject to certain minor modifications to address technical issues.
The Commission's decision in this case provides important guidance for employers and employees in the meat processing industry, as well as for those in other industries, on the requirements for a valid and effective enterprise agreement. The decision highlights the importance of genuine bargaining and proper consultation with employee representatives, as well as the need for enterprise agreements to meet the "better off overall test" and to cover a range of mandatory topics. Employers and employees should carefully consider these requirements when negotiating and drafting enterprise agreements to ensure that they are compliant with the law and provide for a fair and effective means of resolving workplace disputes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.