Lushchayev and Secretary, Department of Education, Skills and Employment
Case
•
[2022] AATA 374
•4 March 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lushchayev and Secretary, Department of Education, Skills and Employment [2022] AATA 374
[2022] AATA 374
4 March 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Lushchayev and Secretary, Department of Education, Skills and Employment*, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application by Mr Mark Philip Lushchayev for re-credit of a FEE-HELP debt. The dispute concerned whether Mr Lushchayev's circumstances qualified as "special circumstances" under the relevant legislation, entitling him to remission of his debt for certain units of study.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether Mr Lushchayev's circumstances, including studying overseas, temporary accommodation, and psychological stress, were beyond his control and whether their full impact occurred on or after the census date for the units of study. The central legal issue was whether these circumstances constituted "special circumstances" as defined by section 36-20(1)(d) of the *Higher Education Support Act 2003* (Cth).
The Tribunal reasoned that Mr Lushchayev had not met the requisite limbs of section 36-21 of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal was not satisfied that special circumstances applied. The Tribunal found that Mr Lushchayev was therefore not entitled to have his FEE-HELP debt remitted. The Tribunal affirmed the reviewable decision of the Respondent, dated 22 December 2020.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether Mr Lushchayev's circumstances, including studying overseas, temporary accommodation, and psychological stress, were beyond his control and whether their full impact occurred on or after the census date for the units of study. The central legal issue was whether these circumstances constituted "special circumstances" as defined by section 36-20(1)(d) of the *Higher Education Support Act 2003* (Cth).
The Tribunal reasoned that Mr Lushchayev had not met the requisite limbs of section 36-21 of the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal was not satisfied that special circumstances applied. The Tribunal found that Mr Lushchayev was therefore not entitled to have his FEE-HELP debt remitted. The Tribunal affirmed the reviewable decision of the Respondent, dated 22 December 2020.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Employment Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
RWHG and Secretary, Department of Education [2025] ARTA 1119
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Vandenberk and Secretary, Department of Education
[2024] AATA 1668
RWHG and Secretary, Department of Education
[2025] ARTA 1119
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Montenegro v Secretary, Department of Education
[2020] FCAFC 210
Ullah and Secretary, Department of Education and Training
[2018] AATA 2159
Georgiou and Secretary, Department of Education and Training
[2019] AATA 170