| [2022] FWCA 726 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Enterprise Agreement
Lululemon Athletica Australia Pty Ltd T/A Lululemon
(AG2022/57)
lululemon athletica Australia Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2021
| Storage services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 2 MARCH 2022 |
Application for approval of the lululemon athletica Australia Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2021
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the lululemon athletica Australia Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings (Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. The Undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with section 54 of the Act, will operate from 21 March 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515173 PR738880>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Lululemon Athletica Australia Pty Ltd T/A Lululemon [2022] FWCA 726
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 726
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation and application of the "better off overall test" as prescribed by section 230 of the Fair Work Act. This test requires that, overall, employees be no worse off and at least some employees be better off in the terms of the enterprise agreement compared to the applicable award or safety net. The respondents argued that the proposed agreement did not satisfy these criteria, particularly in relation to pay rates and conditions for certain employee groups. The applicants, on the other hand, submitted that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and that it met the statutory requirements.
The Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both parties, focusing on the financial implications and benefits of the proposed agreement. The Commission examined the pay rates and conditions outlined in the agreement, comparing them against the relevant award and the safety net provisions. After careful deliberation, the Commission found that the agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" for certain employee groups, particularly those who would receive minimal or no pay increases. However, the Commission also found that the agreement provided a number of benefits, including improved working conditions and enhanced job security. Ultimately, the Commission determined that the benefits of the agreement outweighed the shortcomings, and that it was in the best interests of the employees to approve the agreement.
Accordingly, the Commission approved the lululemon athletica Australia Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2021, subject to the conditions outlined in the decision. The agreement was certified as meeting the requirements of the Fair Work Act, and the Commission directed the applicants to take the necessary steps to give effect to the agreement. The respondents' objections were dismissed, and the agreement was approved as a valid enterprise agreement under the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.