LUKIS & HANLON
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 1020
•5 August 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
LUKIS & HANLON [2013] FCCA 1020
[2013] FCCA 1020
5 August 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders made by Judge Lapthorn in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The dispute involved the mother and father regarding the care arrangements for their two children, born in 2009.
The court was required to determine the specific orders concerning parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and the time the children would spend with each parent. This included detailed provisions for weekend time, school holiday periods, communication between parents and children, changeover arrangements, and the exchange of information regarding the children's welfare and development. The court also needed to address the process for resolving future disputes and the discharge of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Judge Lapthorn ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, with the father to be kept informed of decisions regarding the children's long-term care, welfare, and development. The children were ordered to live with the mother, with specific provisions for the father to spend time with them, including detailed arrangements for weekends and school holidays that varied depending on the children's age. The orders also established communication protocols, outlined responsibilities for travel costs and arrangements during changeovers, and mandated information sharing between the parents regarding the children's health, education, and activities. A dispute resolution process involving family dispute resolution practitioners was also stipulated.
The court was required to determine the specific orders concerning parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and the time the children would spend with each parent. This included detailed provisions for weekend time, school holiday periods, communication between parents and children, changeover arrangements, and the exchange of information regarding the children's welfare and development. The court also needed to address the process for resolving future disputes and the discharge of the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Judge Lapthorn ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, with the father to be kept informed of decisions regarding the children's long-term care, welfare, and development. The children were ordered to live with the mother, with specific provisions for the father to spend time with them, including detailed arrangements for weekends and school holidays that varied depending on the children's age. The orders also established communication protocols, outlined responsibilities for travel costs and arrangements during changeovers, and mandated information sharing between the parents regarding the children's health, education, and activities. A dispute resolution process involving family dispute resolution practitioners was also stipulated.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
LUKIS & HANLON [2013] FCCA 1020
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
2
Sayer v Radcliffe
[2012] FamCAFC 209
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles
[2001] NSWCA 305
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
[2011] HCA 21