| [2019] FWCA 2373 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
LP&E Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2018/5668)
LP&E CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018-2022
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 8 APRIL 2019 |
Application for approval of the LP&E Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the LP&E Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018-2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by LP&E Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings (Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
[4] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.
[5] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 April 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502798 PR706702>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- LP&E Construction Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 2373
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 2373
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it contained terms that were fair and reasonable in all respects. The unions argued that the agreement failed to provide adequate protections for employees, particularly concerning pay rates, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The commission had to determine if the agreement's terms were sufficiently fair and reasonable and if they complied with the relevant statutory provisions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The commission highlighted several deficiencies, including inadequate provisions for casual employees, insufficient protections for penalty rates, and unclear processes for resolving disputes. The commission concluded that the agreement did not provide the necessary protections for employees and failed to meet the standards of fairness and reasonableness required by the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed.
No further orders were made by the commission. The agreement remains inoperative, and the parties are at liberty to negotiate a revised agreement that addresses the commission's concerns.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.