Lowy v The Land and Environment Court of NSW
Case
•
[2002] NSWCA 353
•1 November 2002
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lowy v The Land and Environment Court of NSW [2002] NSWCA 353
[2002] NSWCA 353
1 November 2002
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal, considered an appeal by Mr Lowy against a decision of the Land and Environment Court. The Land and Environment Court had allowed an appeal by an objector against the refusal of a development application, granting the objector leave to participate in those proceedings. Mr Lowy sought to appeal the Land and Environment Court's decision to the Supreme Court.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether an objector, who had been granted leave to participate in proceedings before the Land and Environment Court, had a right to appeal to the Supreme Court against the Land and Environment Court's decision, and whether prerogative relief was available in the circumstances. A further issue was whether a restriction on development on the foreshore side of a foreshore building line constituted a development standard for the purposes of the relevant legislation.
The Court of Appeal held that an objector who is granted leave to participate in proceedings before the Land and Environment Court does not thereby acquire a right to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court found that the restriction in question was not a development standard. Consequently, the Court dismissed Mr Lowy's appeal, granting an extension of time for him to file his notice of appeal but ordering that he pay the costs of the appeal and the summons.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether an objector, who had been granted leave to participate in proceedings before the Land and Environment Court, had a right to appeal to the Supreme Court against the Land and Environment Court's decision, and whether prerogative relief was available in the circumstances. A further issue was whether a restriction on development on the foreshore side of a foreshore building line constituted a development standard for the purposes of the relevant legislation.
The Court of Appeal held that an objector who is granted leave to participate in proceedings before the Land and Environment Court does not thereby acquire a right to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court found that the restriction in question was not a development standard. Consequently, the Court dismissed Mr Lowy's appeal, granting an extension of time for him to file his notice of appeal but ordering that he pay the costs of the appeal and the summons.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Property Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Costs
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kavia Holdings Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [2003] NSWLEC 195
Cases Citing This Decision
38
Warkworth Mining Limited v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc
[2014] NSWCA 105
Sertari Pty Limited v Quakers Hill SPV Pty Limited
[2012] NSWCA 292
Abret Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2011] NSWCA 107
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
0
Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd
[2006] NSWSC 895
Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd
[2006] NSWSC 895