Lowe v Lowe (No 2)
Case
•
[2015] NSWSC 1626
•04 November 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lowe v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1626
[2015] NSWSC 1626
04 November 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The proceedings between the parties arose out of the estate of the deceased, John Lowe, who passed away intestate. The second wife, Anne Lowe, sought a greater share of the estate than the statutory portion and also maintenance. The case was heard in the Family Court of Australia. Anne Lowe contended that she had a greater claim to the estate due to her contributions to the deceased's wellbeing and the fact that she had her own home and kept her financial affairs separate from the deceased.
The court was tasked with determining the extent of Anne Lowe's entitlement to the estate under the Family Provision Act 2008. Specifically, the court had to consider whether she was a spouse within the meaning of the Act and, if so, whether she had made a significant financial or non-financial contribution to the deceased's wellbeing. Additionally, the court had to assess whether she was in need of maintenance and support from the estate.
The court held that Anne Lowe was indeed a spouse and found that she had made a significant non-financial contribution to the deceased's wellbeing. The court noted that while Anne had her own home and kept her financial affairs separate from the deceased, she had provided care and support to him in his later years. The court also found that she was in need of maintenance and support from the estate. Accordingly, the court made orders for Anne Lowe to receive a greater share of the estate than the statutory portion and also maintenance.
The court was tasked with determining the extent of Anne Lowe's entitlement to the estate under the Family Provision Act 2008. Specifically, the court had to consider whether she was a spouse within the meaning of the Act and, if so, whether she had made a significant financial or non-financial contribution to the deceased's wellbeing. Additionally, the court had to assess whether she was in need of maintenance and support from the estate.
The court held that Anne Lowe was indeed a spouse and found that she had made a significant non-financial contribution to the deceased's wellbeing. The court noted that while Anne had her own home and kept her financial affairs separate from the deceased, she had provided care and support to him in his later years. The court also found that she was in need of maintenance and support from the estate. Accordingly, the court made orders for Anne Lowe to receive a greater share of the estate than the statutory portion and also maintenance.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Succession Law
Legal Concepts
-
Family Provision and Maintenance
-
Succession Act 2006
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Lowe v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1626
Most Recent Citation
Lowe v Lowe (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1800
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Lowe v Lowe (No 3)
[2015] NSWSC 1800
Lowe v Lowe (No 3)
[2015] NSWSC 1800
Cases Cited
17
Statutory Material Cited
1
West v Mann
[2013] NSWSC 1852
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59