Lovine & Connor

The parties in this matter were a husband and wife, with the wife seeking to vary existing orders made on 8 September 2011. The application was heard by Cronin J.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application, made by written submission on 30 September 2011, should be granted. A secondary issue arose from the wife's subsequent submissions filed on 14 October 2011, which the court interpreted as an application for costs.

Cronin J dismissed the wife's application pursuant to paragraph 5 of the 8 September 2011 orders. Furthermore, to the extent that the wife's submissions of 14 October 2011 constituted an application for costs, that application was also dismissed.