LOVELL & LOVELL

In the matter of *Lovell & Lovell*, heard before Cronin J, the husband sought to proceed with an Application in a Case filed on 29 April 2011. The wife was the respondent in these proceedings. The precise nature of the dispute is not fully detailed, but it involved an "Application in a Case" filed by the husband and a "controversial entry" on a document related to B Real Estate, which the wife's solicitor sought to copy.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant an extension of time for the husband's application to be heard. Relatedly, the court had to determine the appropriate orders concerning the disputed document and the costs of the proceedings.

Cronin J granted an extension of time for the husband's application to be heard. However, the application itself was ultimately dismissed. The court made a specific order allowing the wife's solicitor to copy a particular page containing a "controversial entry" from a document held by B Real Estate, provided that non-relevant entries were redacted and the copy was promptly provided to the husband. The husband was ordered to pay the wife's costs, fixed at $300.