Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 65
•12 April 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW [2019] NSWCA 65
[2019] NSWCA 65
12 April 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated (LDM) sought judicial review of a decision by the Minister for Planning to grant consent to a concept development application (Concept DA) for the redevelopment of the Sydney Football Stadium. The Concept DA included Stage 1 works involving the demolition of the existing stadium. LDM contended that the Minister's consent was granted in contravention of mandatory requirements of the *Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979* (NSW) (EPA Act).
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales were whether the Concept DA had been placed on public exhibition for the mandatory minimum period, and whether the Minister had complied with specific provisions of the EPA Act and related regulations. Specifically, the court considered whether the repealed section 89F of the EPA Act, which stipulated a minimum exhibition period of 30 days, was a "relocated" provision under clause 4A(2) of the *Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and other Provisions) Regulation 2017* (NSW). Furthermore, the court examined whether LDM had discharged its onus of proving that the Minister failed to form an opinion on the design excellence of the proposal as required by clause 6.21(3) of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan, and whether the Minister had complied with clause 7 of SEPP 55, which addresses development on contaminated land.
The Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed LDM's application. The court found that the exhibition period for the Concept DA met the statutory requirements, interpreting the relevant transitional provisions to mean that the repealed section 89F did not apply in the manner contended by LDM. The court also held that LDM had not discharged its onus of establishing that the Minister failed to form the requisite opinion on design excellence or that the Minister had failed to comply with the provisions of SEPP 55 concerning contaminated land.
The court directed the parties to file agreed short minutes of order as to costs within 14 days, with provisions for further submissions if agreement could not be reached.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales were whether the Concept DA had been placed on public exhibition for the mandatory minimum period, and whether the Minister had complied with specific provisions of the EPA Act and related regulations. Specifically, the court considered whether the repealed section 89F of the EPA Act, which stipulated a minimum exhibition period of 30 days, was a "relocated" provision under clause 4A(2) of the *Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and other Provisions) Regulation 2017* (NSW). Furthermore, the court examined whether LDM had discharged its onus of proving that the Minister failed to form an opinion on the design excellence of the proposal as required by clause 6.21(3) of the Sydney Local Environmental Plan, and whether the Minister had complied with clause 7 of SEPP 55, which addresses development on contaminated land.
The Court of Appeal ultimately dismissed LDM's application. The court found that the exhibition period for the Concept DA met the statutory requirements, interpreting the relevant transitional provisions to mean that the repealed section 89F did not apply in the manner contended by LDM. The court also held that LDM had not discharged its onus of establishing that the Minister failed to form the requisite opinion on design excellence or that the Minister had failed to comply with the provisions of SEPP 55 concerning contaminated land.
The court directed the parties to file agreed short minutes of order as to costs within 14 days, with provisions for further submissions if agreement could not be reached.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Gomon Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2019] NSWLEC 116
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW (No 2)
[2019] NSWCA 118
Hanave Pty Ltd v Waverley Council
[2025] NSWLEC 19
Hanave Pty Ltd v Waverley Council
[2025] NSWLEC 19
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
12
Miller v Sutherland Shire Council
[2008] NSWLEC 158
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW; Waverley Council v Infrastructure NSW
[2019] NSWLEC 20
Waverley Council v Infrastructure NSW
[2019] NSWLEC 18