Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW (No 2)
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 118
•23 May 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 118
[2019] NSWCA 118
23 May 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated (LDM) appealed a decision of the primary judge, and Infrastructure NSW and the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces (the Minister) were the respondents. The dispute concerned LDM's challenge to the validity of certain planning decisions made by the Minister. The appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether LDM, as the unsuccessful appellant, should be ordered to pay the costs of the respondents, and if so, whether more than one set of costs should be ordered. This involved considering whether the litigation was brought in the public interest and if there was any "something more" that would displace the ordinary rule that costs follow the event.
The Court of Appeal applied the general rule that an unsuccessful party should pay the costs of the successful party. It found that while LDM's litigation might have raised matters of public interest, this alone was not sufficient to displace the ordinary rule. The Court determined that there was no "something more" demonstrated that warranted a departure from the standard costs order. Consequently, LDM was ordered to pay the Minister's costs of the appeal.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether LDM, as the unsuccessful appellant, should be ordered to pay the costs of the respondents, and if so, whether more than one set of costs should be ordered. This involved considering whether the litigation was brought in the public interest and if there was any "something more" that would displace the ordinary rule that costs follow the event.
The Court of Appeal applied the general rule that an unsuccessful party should pay the costs of the successful party. It found that while LDM's litigation might have raised matters of public interest, this alone was not sufficient to displace the ordinary rule. The Court determined that there was no "something more" demonstrated that warranted a departure from the standard costs order. Consequently, LDM was ordered to pay the Minister's costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Standing
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Boomerang and Blueys Residents Group Inc v New South Wales Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and MidCoast Council (No 3) [2020] NSWLEC 150
Cases Citing This Decision
22
Zurich Australian Insurance Limited v CIMIC Group Limited (No 2)
[2024] NSWCA 276
Cases Cited
17
Statutory Material Cited
1
Local Democracy Matters Incorporated v Infrastructure NSW
[2019] NSWCA 65
Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Ltd (No 3)
[2010] NSWLEC 59
Anderson v NSW Minister for Planning (No 2)
[2008] NSWLEC 272