Lloyd and Panetta

In the matter of *Lloyd and Panetta*, heard by Cronin J, the applicant sought to have an application filed on 7 January 2013 relisted. The respondent's knowledge of the proceedings and the applicant's failure to provide proper material to enable the Court to determine the matter were central to the dispute.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had satisfied the necessary requirements to have the previously filed application relisted. This involved assessing the adequacy of the material provided by the applicant and determining if there was sufficient evidence to support the orders sought. The Court also considered the extent of the respondent's knowledge of the proceedings.

Cronin J reasoned that the applicant had not provided the Court with the necessary material to determine the matter. Consequently, the Court ordered that the application filed on 7 January 2013 be struck out. The applicant was further directed to file a new application, supported by affidavit, addressing specific deficiencies regarding the lack of proper material, the evidence supporting the sought orders, and the respondent's knowledge of the proceedings. Failure to comply with these requirements by 22 August 2014 would result in the formal dismissal of the application. The applicant was also ordered to serve the Court's order and reasons upon the respondent by post.