Llewellyn and Llewellyn
Case
•
[2016] FCCA 3111
•14 December 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Llewellyn and Llewellyn [2016] FCCA 3111
[2016] FCCA 3111
14 December 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Llewellyn and Llewellyn*, the applicant wife and respondent husband sought orders from the court concerning the division of their property. The dispute centred on the equitable distribution of assets and liabilities acquired during the marriage.
The court was required to determine how the parties' various assets and liabilities, including a motor vehicle, a loan agreement, bank accounts, superannuation, and real property, should be divided. The court also had to consider the appropriate orders regarding the costs of the proceedings.
The court ordered that the respondent husband pay the applicant wife $22,000 within one month as a property settlement. The respondent was declared the owner of a specific Nissan motor vehicle and was to assume responsibility for the associated loan agreement, with the applicant required to take steps to facilitate this transfer. The orders further stipulated that, with specific exceptions, each party would retain sole entitlement to other property in their name or possession, joint bank account monies would become the respondent's property, and each party would forgo claims to the other's superannuation. Joint tenancies were severed, and each party was to bear their own costs.
The court was required to determine how the parties' various assets and liabilities, including a motor vehicle, a loan agreement, bank accounts, superannuation, and real property, should be divided. The court also had to consider the appropriate orders regarding the costs of the proceedings.
The court ordered that the respondent husband pay the applicant wife $22,000 within one month as a property settlement. The respondent was declared the owner of a specific Nissan motor vehicle and was to assume responsibility for the associated loan agreement, with the applicant required to take steps to facilitate this transfer. The orders further stipulated that, with specific exceptions, each party would retain sole entitlement to other property in their name or possession, joint bank account monies would become the respondent's property, and each party would forgo claims to the other's superannuation. Joint tenancies were severed, and each party was to bear their own costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Llewellyn and Llewellyn [2016] FCCA 3111
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
APPLETON & DRAPER
[2015] FCCA 3186