Live Group Pty Ltd v Rabbi Ulman
Case
•
[2017] NSWSC 1759
•14 December 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Live Group Pty Ltd v Rabbi Ulman [2017] NSWSC 1759
[2017] NSWSC 1759
14 December 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Live Group Pty Ltd sought an injunction against Rabbi Ulman, alleging that he had improperly pressured the company's employees and breached a non-disclosure agreement. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute centred on whether Rabbi Ulman had engaged in contempt of court and whether the principles of natural justice, specifically the rule against bias, applied to him.
The legal issues before the court were whether Rabbi Ulman had indeed exerted improper pressure on employees and breached the non-disclosure agreement, and whether the principles of apprehended bias were applicable to him. The court had to determine if there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on his part.
The court found that Rabbi Ulman had engaged in improper pressure on employees and breached the non-disclosure agreement. However, regarding the applicability of the principles of natural justice, the court held that these principles did not apply to him. It concluded that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias in his conduct. Therefore, the court dismissed the application for contempt against Rabbi Ulman.
The Federal Court of Australia dismissed the application for contempt against Rabbi Ulman and held that the principles of natural justice, specifically the rule against bias, were not applicable to him.
The legal issues before the court were whether Rabbi Ulman had indeed exerted improper pressure on employees and breached the non-disclosure agreement, and whether the principles of apprehended bias were applicable to him. The court had to determine if there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on his part.
The court found that Rabbi Ulman had engaged in improper pressure on employees and breached the non-disclosure agreement. However, regarding the applicability of the principles of natural justice, the court held that these principles did not apply to him. It concluded that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias in his conduct. Therefore, the court dismissed the application for contempt against Rabbi Ulman.
The Federal Court of Australia dismissed the application for contempt against Rabbi Ulman and held that the principles of natural justice, specifically the rule against bias, were not applicable to him.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Contempt of Court
-
Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Setka v Carroll [2019] VSC 571
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Ulman v Live Group Pty Ltd
[2018] NSWCA 338
Pilotto v Cosoleto; Papi & Papi v Cosoleto and Cosoleto v Cosoleto
[2019] NSWSC 1454
Live Group Pty Ltd v Rabbi Ulman
[2018] NSWSC 393
Cases Cited
29
Statutory Material Cited
3
Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
[2000] HCA 63
Johnson v Johnson
[2000] HCA 48
Re JRL; Ex parte CJL
[1986] HCA 39