Liu (Migration)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 3239
•2 August 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Liu (Migration) [2019] AATA 3239
[2019] AATA 3239
2 August 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa, Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme), Temporary Residence Transition stream, for the first named applicant, who was employed as a Café or Restaurant Manager. The second named applicant was a member of the first applicant's family unit. The decision was made by the Tribunal, with Member Amanda Mendes Da Costa presiding.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the first named applicant met the requirements of cl.187.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause relates to the criteria for a Subclass 187 visa.
The Tribunal reasoned that it had previously made a decision on 30 July 2019, approving the nomination made by the first named applicant's prospective employer, Chopstix Mildura Pty Ltd. As the nomination was approved, the Tribunal was satisfied that the first named applicant met the requirements of cl.187.223(2). Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the appropriate course of action was to remit the visa application to the Minister for consideration of the remaining visa criteria. The Tribunal also found that as the first named applicant met the primary criteria, the second named applicant, as a member of the family unit, also met the criteria for the Subclass 187 visa. The Tribunal remitted the applications for reconsideration with a direction that the first named applicant met cl.187.223(2).
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the first named applicant met the requirements of cl.187.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause relates to the criteria for a Subclass 187 visa.
The Tribunal reasoned that it had previously made a decision on 30 July 2019, approving the nomination made by the first named applicant's prospective employer, Chopstix Mildura Pty Ltd. As the nomination was approved, the Tribunal was satisfied that the first named applicant met the requirements of cl.187.223(2). Consequently, the Tribunal determined that the appropriate course of action was to remit the visa application to the Minister for consideration of the remaining visa criteria. The Tribunal also found that as the first named applicant met the primary criteria, the second named applicant, as a member of the family unit, also met the criteria for the Subclass 187 visa. The Tribunal remitted the applications for reconsideration with a direction that the first named applicant met cl.187.223(2).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Liu (Migration) [2019] AATA 3239
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0