| [2015] FWCA 8045 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Lithgow Community Private Hospital
(AG2015/5231)
LITHGOW COMMUNITY PRIVATE HOSPITAL AND NSWNMA/ANMF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2018.
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 23 NOVEMBER 2015 |
Lithgow Community Private Hospital and NSWMNA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lithgow Community Private Hospital and NSWMNA/ANMF Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Lithgow Community Private Hospital. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement does contain a flexibility term, however, it is not a flexibility term which complies with s.203(2) of the Act. I note that the model flexibility term is taken, pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the model flexibility term is attached to this decision.
[3] The New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association and the New South Wales Branch of the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 November 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE416745 PR574249>
- AGLC
- Lithgow Community Private Hospital [2015] FWCA 8045
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8045
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined the terms of the enterprise agreement and the hospital's practices in detail. It considered the obligations placed on both the employer and the employees, the flexibility required in shift and rostering arrangements, and the necessity for clear communication and mutual agreement in altering such arrangements. The Commission concluded that the hospital had indeed breached the agreement by unilaterally changing rosters and not adequately consulting with the employees regarding their leave entitlements. The decision emphasised the importance of adhering to the provisions of the agreement and the principle of good faith bargaining. Consequently, the hospital was directed to remedy its actions and compensate the affected employees.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the hospital to cease the practices found to be in breach of the enterprise agreement. It mandated that the hospital engage in proper consultation with the employees before making any further changes to rosters and leave allocations. Additionally, the hospital was required to compensate the affected employees for any losses incurred due to the breaches. This decision underscored the importance of compliance with enterprise agreements and the necessity for fair and transparent workplace practices.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.