| [2019] FWCA 225 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Linfox Australia Pty Ltd T/A Linfox Australia
(AG2018/6011)
LINFOX AUSTRALIA & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS (HEINZ ALTONA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Linfox Australia & National Union of Workers (Heinz Altona) Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Linfox Australia & National Union of Workers (Heinz Altona) Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linfox Australia Pty Ltd T/A Linfox Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 31.1.28
• Clause 15
• Clause 35.1.2(c)
• Clause 35.3.1(c)
However, noting clause 8.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 January 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501333 PR703855>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Linfox Australia Pty Ltd T/A Linfox Australia [2019] FWCA 225
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 225
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Commission had to address were whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Act, particularly focusing on the process through which the agreement was made, the fairness of its terms, and compliance with the statutory obligations. The Commission examined the procedural fairness in the bargaining process, the presence of any unfair terms, and whether the agreement included all mandatory bargaining items. The focus also included assessing if the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and whether it complied with the good faith obligations of the parties involved.
In reaching its decision, the Commission carefully analysed the submissions and evidence provided by both Linfox Australia and the National Union of Workers. It found that the bargaining process was conducted fairly, and the agreement was made in good faith. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not contain any unfair terms and included all mandatory bargaining items. Furthermore, it was determined that the agreement was beneficial to both parties and provided adequate protections for employees. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, recognising it as a valid and binding arrangement between the parties.
As a result of the decision, the Fair Work Commission approved the Linfox Australia & National Union of Workers (Heinz Altona) Enterprise Agreement 2018, which is now a legally binding agreement between Linfox Australia Pty Ltd and the National Union of Workers. The approval ensures that the terms and conditions of employment set out in the agreement are enforceable and provide a framework for the employment relationship between the parties. This decision sets a precedent for the enforcement of enterprise agreements in similar contexts, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations and the protection of employees' rights.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.