Linfox Australia Pty Ltd Summary

[2013] FWCA 7015

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Linfox Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/8754)

LINFOX NEW SOUTH WALES (WORKSHOP) AGREEMENT 2013

Vehicle industry
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN	SYDNEY, 16 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Linfox New South Wales (Workshop) Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Linfox New South Wales (Workshop) Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linfox Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Linfox Australia Pty Ltd recently appeared before the Fair Work Commission in an application for approval of the Linfox New South Wales (Workshop) Agreement 2013. The dispute centred on the procedural fairness of the bargaining process leading to the agreement, with the union, the Transport Workers Union, alleging that Linfox had not fairly negotiated the agreement and had acted in bad faith. The union argued that Linfox had failed to provide relevant information and had not genuinely attempted to reach an agreement.

The Commission needed to determine whether the agreement was made in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and genuine negotiation, as required by the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining the conduct of Linfox during the bargaining process and assessing whether there were any instances of bad faith or failure to provide information. The union contended that Linfox had not shared information about the company's financial position and had made misleading statements. The Commission also had to consider whether the union had genuinely attempted to negotiate in good faith.

After examining the evidence, the Commission found that Linfox had not engaged in bad faith bargaining, nor had it failed to provide information. The Commission held that the union had not demonstrated that Linfox acted in bad faith or failed to genuinely negotiate. The union's allegations of misleading statements and withheld information were not substantiated. The Commission approved the agreement, finding that it was made in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness and genuine negotiation.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Linfox New South Wales (Workshop) Agreement 2013. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and that Linfox had genuinely attempted to negotiate. The union's claims of bad faith and withholding of information were rejected. The Commission's decision is a reminder of the importance of procedural fairness and good faith in the collective bargaining process.

Linfox Australia Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established