| [2014] FWCA 7278 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Linfox Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8779)
LINFOX AUSTRALIA (BULK PETROLEUM) AGREEMENT 2014
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Linfox Australia (Bulk Petroleum) Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of the Linfox Australia (Bulk Petroleum) Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application is made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Linfox Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). It involves a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Following receipt of the application two issues were raised by an employee in Victoria who is to be covered by the proposed Agreement. The first issue concerns the voting process, and a query about whether the process was carried out correctly, given that employees in Victoria apparently voted on 5 and 6 August, but voting in New South Wales did not take place until 13 and 14 August. In this context it is noted that the timeframe set out in the Employer’s statutory declaration confirms voting commenced on 5 August and concluded on 18 August.
[3] The second issue concerns the distribution of the Notice of Employee Representational Rights in Victoria. The employee states he did not receive, or cannot recall seeing or being given the Notice.
[4] The Commission subsequently made contact with the Applicant and with the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, who were a bargaining representative for the proposed Agreement, seeking their views in response. An explanation was provided for the delay in voting in New South Wales. It concerned the availability of a Union official. Further details about the voting process were also provided in the Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application. The Employer also confirmed that the Notice of Employee Representational Rights was posted on site notice/communication boards. Again, further details about this were provided in the Employer’s statutory declaration. I am satisfied with the explanation provided in regard to each of these matters.
[5] I am also satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54 of the Act will operate from 24 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410659 PR556623>
- AGLC
- Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7278
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7278
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable employment terms, if it complied with the relevant legislative requirements, and if the bargaining process was conducted in good faith. The Commission had to consider the balance between the rights of employers to manage their businesses and the protection of employees' interests.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and it complied with the necessary legislative provisions. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for adequate protections for employees, including terms on wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions. The Commission also found that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith and that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees.
The Commission approved the Linfox Australia (Bulk Petroleum) Agreement 2014, with the final orders stating that the agreement would apply to the employees of Linfox Australia engaged in the bulk petroleum industry, and that it would be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.