| [2015] FWCA 2419 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2249)
ARMAGUARD ROAD CREW (VICTORIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 8 APRIL 2015 |
Application for approval of the Armaguard Road Crew (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Armaguard Road Crew (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 April 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413442 PR562876>
- AGLC
- Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 2419
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 2419
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement was a "single interest employer agreement" within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it met the "better off overall test" (BOOT) which requires that no employee is worse off in the agreement compared to their existing conditions. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it included all mandatory terms and conditions required by law. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, and if it provided for the fair and efficient determination of terms and conditions of employment.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement was indeed a single interest employer agreement, as it covered employees who were engaged in the road crew operations of Armaguard in Victoria. The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and included all mandatory terms and conditions required by law. It was also determined that the agreement met the BOOT, with no employee being worse off under the new agreement. Furthermore, the Commission found that the agreement provided for the fair and efficient determination of terms and conditions of employment and was fair and reasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the Armaguard Road Crew (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2014.
In its decision, the Commission approved the agreement, ensuring its registration under the Fair Work Act 2009, thereby making it legally binding on the parties. This approval was based on the findings that the agreement met all the statutory requirements, including the BOOT, and was fair and reasonable. The agreement was thus deemed to provide for the fair and efficient determination of terms and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.