| [2015] FWCA 5769 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4563)
ARMAGUARD AND TWU QUEENSLAND COUNTRY BRANCHES ROAD CREW & ASSOCIATED AREAS COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 20 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Armaguard and TWU Queensland Country Branches Road Crew & Associated Areas Collective Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Armaguard and TWU Queensland Country Branches Road Crew & Associated Areas Collective Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement contains a consultation term at clause 11. However, it is not a consultation term that fully complies with s.205 of the Act. Consequently the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement. The Commission notes that the insertion of the model term does not affect the operation of clauses 11.1 and 11.2 of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 August 2015. The nominal expiry date is 10 January 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE415380 PR571044>
- AGLC
- Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5769
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5769
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the agreement provided for minimum wages and conditions, if it met the standards set by the Fair Work Act, and if it was negotiated in good faith. The court had to assess if the agreement was fit for purpose and did not unfairly discriminate against employees. Additionally, it needed to consider whether the agreement complied with the principles of enterprise bargaining and if it included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.
The Fair Work Commission found that the collective agreement satisfied the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. It was determined that the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements and was negotiated in good faith. The commission concluded that the agreement was not unfair and did not discriminate against any group of employees. It was also found to comply with the principles of enterprise bargaining and included adequate dispute resolution mechanisms. Consequently, the application for approval was granted.
The Fair Work Commission approved the collective agreement, and it was registered as a certified agreement under the Fair Work Act. This decision ensures that the agreement will govern the employment conditions for the specified employees, providing a legally binding framework for their work terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.