Lineage Aus Trs Pty Limited Trading as Lineage

Case [2025] FWCA 2852


[2025] FWCA 2852

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Lineage Aus Trs Pty Limited Trading as Lineage

(AG2025/2549)

LINEAGE AUS TRS PTY LTD LURNEA CONVENIENCE & QSR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Storage services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 2 SEPTEMBER 2025

Application for approval of the Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd Lurnea Convenience & QSR Enterprise Agreement 2025

Introduction  

  1. Lineage AUS TRS Pty Limited Trading as Lineage (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd Lurnea Convenience & QSR Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. 

  1. The Agreement will apply to employees who are covered by the Storage Services and Wholesale Award 2020 (the Award).

National Employment Standards (NES)

  1. Clause 8.1.5 of the Agreement states that if an employee fails to give the required notice, the Employer may withhold from any monies due to the employee on termination under this Agreement, an amount not exceeding the amount the employee would have been paid under this Agreement in respect of the period of notice required by this sub-clause, less any period of notice actually given by the employee. This may restrict an employee’s entitlement to payment of NES entitlements upon termination of employment which is inconsistent with Part 2-2 Division 2 of the Act.

Delegates’ Rights Term 

[4]       The Agreement contains a delegates’ rights term at Clause 7.1, however the Agreement only provides for two days paid initial training time whereas clause 29A.8 of the Award provides five days paid training time and at least one day each subsequent year.
[5]       Section 205A(2) of the Act provides that where a delegates’ rights term is less favourable in an agreement compared to the modern award, the agreement term will have no effect, and the most favourable modern award term shall be taken to be a term of the enterprise agreement. Accordingly, the workplace delegates’ rights term from the Award is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the workplace delegates’ rights term can be found in Annexure C. 

Better off Overall Test (BOOT) Issues  

  1. The Commission raised the following issues with the Employer which are relevant to whether employees are better off overall under the Agreement compared to the relevant Award: 

  1. There is some ambiguity as to whether clause 2.5.1 of the Agreement provides shift and overtime penalties for casual employees calculated on the hourly base rates of pay or the casual hourly rates of pay.

  1. Clause 5.4.1 of the Agreement provides that an afternoon shift means any shift finishing after 8:00pm and at or before midnight, which is inconsistent with clause 20.1(d) of the Award which provides that an afternoon shift means a shift finishing after 6:00pm and at or before midnight. Further, the span of hours under clause 3.1 of the Agreement is from 8am-7pm. Therefore, employees who regularly finish a shift between 6pm and 7pm under the Agreement would always be entitled to the afternoon shift penalties under the Award for the entirety of the shift.

Section 190 Undertakings 

  1. The Employer provided written undertakings to address the above NES and BOOT issues. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Schedule 1. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. 

Section 186, 187, 188 and 190  

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. 

Section 183 Bargaining Representatives  

  1. The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. 

  1. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the AMIEU.

Approval 

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 September 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2029.  

DEPUTY PRESIDENT 

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer 

<AE530201  PR791063>

Schedule 1

Details
AGLC
Lineage Aus Trs Pty Limited Trading as Lineage [2025] FWCA 2852
Case
[2025] FWCA 2852
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Australian Industrial Relations Commission involved Lineage AUS TRS Pty Ltd, trading as Lineage, which sought approval for the Lurnea Convenience & QSR Enterprise Agreement 2025. The primary dispute was whether the agreement met the necessary legal standards and requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and appropriate, while opponents raised concerns about various aspects of the agreement, including its compliance with statutory provisions.

The central legal issues revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether the agreement complied with the criteria for "modern awards" and "employee entitlements." The court had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether it provided fair and reasonable terms, and if it aligned with the objectives of the Act to promote fair work practices. Additionally, the court examined if the agreement adequately addressed the rights and obligations of employees and employers as stipulated by the relevant legislation.

The commission conducted a thorough analysis of the agreement, considering submissions from both parties and relevant statutory provisions. It was found that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, as it contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, and it provided for the entitlements of employees as required by the Fair Work Act 2009. The commission concluded that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and did not contravene any legal requirements. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the Lurnea Convenience & QSR Enterprise Agreement 2025 was approved.

In summary, the Australian Industrial Relations Commission approved the Lurnea Convenience & QSR Enterprise Agreement 2025, finding it to be fair, reasonable, and compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision was based on the comprehensive evaluation of the agreement against the statutory criteria and the submissions from both parties involved in the dispute.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.