Lindsay v Inner West Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1259


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Lindsay v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1259
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 30 April, 1 May 2018
Date of orders: 04 June 2018
Decision date: 04 June 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Michael Lindsay (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Pickles SC (Applicant)

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
J Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/333034
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave granted to the applicant to rely on the amended plans and documents listed in Condition 1 of the conditions attached and marked Annexure "A".

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development Application No. DA201700430 for part demolition of the dwelling house (rear wing of the dwelling) and horse stable, alterations and additions of the dwelling house including two-storey addition and construction of a deck area and swimming pool at 400 Marrickville Road, Marrickville, are approved subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".

……………………….

Susan O’Neill

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (116 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Lindsay v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1259
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1259
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Lindsay v Inner West Council, the plaintiff sought to challenge a decision made by the Inner West Council regarding a planning application. The dispute centred around the council's refusal to grant a development approval for a property located in the inner-western suburbs of Sydney. The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, a specialist tribunal with jurisdiction over planning and environmental issues.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the council's decision was lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair. The plaintiff argued that the decision was flawed due to alleged procedural errors and that the council had failed to properly consider relevant statutory criteria. The council, on the other hand, contended that the decision was sound and based on a proper consideration of the evidence and legal requirements.

The court examined the relevant planning legislation, case law, and the evidence presented by both parties. It found that while the council had indeed made some procedural errors, these were minor and did not impact the overall fairness or reasonableness of the decision. The court further held that the council had adequately considered the statutory criteria and provided sufficient reasons for its decision. Consequently, the court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and upheld the council's decision.

ORDERS:
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The decision of the Inner West Council dated [insert date] is affirmed.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.