[2013] FWCA 5599 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2271)
AMWU & LINDE MATERIAL HANDLING PTY LTD (VICTORIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 12 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the AMWU & Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AMWU & Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd (Victoria) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 19 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403022 PR540082>
- AGLC
- Linde Material Handling Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5599
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5599
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the Enterprise Agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically focusing on the process of its negotiation, the fairness of its terms, and whether it complied with the mandatory provisions of the Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement was appropriately certified by the relevant industrial officers and if it met the criteria for being a bona fide enterprise agreement.
In determining the application, the Commission examined the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process and the nature of the agreement's terms. It found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and contained provisions that were fair and reasonable. The Commission also confirmed that the agreement was appropriately certified and met all the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the application was successful, and the Enterprise Agreement was approved. The court's decision was based on the comprehensive analysis of the agreement's contents, the negotiation process, and the compliance with legislative standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.