Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lin v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1172 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 5 April 2018 Date of orders: 05 April 2018 Decision date: 05 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Froh R Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jin Lin (Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr Chris McEwen SC (Applicant)
Ms Christina Renner, Dentons (Applicant)
Ms Danielle Le Breton, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/324453 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
REGISTRAR: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Registrar, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans listed at A.3 set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to DA 502/2016 subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
S Froh
Registrar of the Land and Environment Court
Annexure A (348 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Lin v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1172
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1172
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the Council's refusal of the planning permit was lawful and, if not, whether it should be quashed. Additionally, the court had to assess whether there were procedural errors in the assessment process that warranted the application to be reconsidered. The validity of the Council's reasons for refusal and the proper scope of the review process were also central to the legal issues at hand.
The court found that the Council had indeed failed to properly consider certain statutory requirements in their refusal of the planning permit, leading to an unlawful decision. The court highlighted that the Council did not adequately address specific planning considerations that were pertinent to the application. As a result, the court quashed the Council's decision and ordered the Council to reconsider the application in accordance with the law. The court further declared that the Council was required to properly review the application with due regard to all relevant statutory and regulatory provisions.
The final orders of the court included quashing the Council's decision, mandating the Council to reconsider the planning permit application, and declaring the Council's obligation to conduct a proper review in compliance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.