Lin (Migration)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 5280
•19 November 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Lin (Migration) [2019] AATA 5280
[2019] AATA 5280
19 November 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa. The applicant, identified as Lin, sought review of a decision concerning their eligibility for this visa, which is a type of Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the criteria for the Subclass 187 visa, specifically in relation to clause 187.233(2) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause pertains to the requirements for the nominated position and the applicant's qualifications or experience.
The Tribunal, after considering the circumstances, determined that the applicant did meet the specified criteria. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application back to the Department for reconsideration, with a direction that the applicant satisfies clause 187.233(2). The Tribunal's decision was made by Member Andrew McLean Williams.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the criteria for the Subclass 187 visa, specifically in relation to clause 187.233(2) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994. This clause pertains to the requirements for the nominated position and the applicant's qualifications or experience.
The Tribunal, after considering the circumstances, determined that the applicant did meet the specified criteria. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application back to the Department for reconsideration, with a direction that the applicant satisfies clause 187.233(2). The Tribunal's decision was made by Member Andrew McLean Williams.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Lin (Migration) [2019] AATA 5280
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0