FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 729
JING JING LI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 390 of 2001WHITLAM J
1 JUNE 2001
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 390 of 2001
BETWEEN:
JING JING LI
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION &
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 JUNE 2001
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 390 of 2001
BETWEEN:
JING JING LI
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION
AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
WHITLAM J
DATE:
1 JUNE 2001
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The proceeding before the Court is an application for an order of review in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal made on 1 March 2001 and handed down on 27 March 2001. The present application was filed on 12 April 2001. There was no appearance by the applicant at the first directions hearing on 25 May 2001 and the matter was stood over until today on the basis that if there was no appearance the respondent would move to have the matter dismissed.
The solicitor for the respondent wrote to the applicant notifying her that the matter was listed today and that the respondent would seek to have the matter dismissed if there was no appearance. There being no appearance today, it is appropriate to make that order in terms of O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules.
Accordingly, I order that the application be dismissed with costs.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Whitlam. Associate:
Dated: 24 October 2001
The applicant did not appear. Solicitor for the respondent: Ms S Goodman of Blake Dawson Waldron Date of hearing: 1 June 2001 Date of judgment: 1 June 2001
- AGLC
- Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 729
- Case
- [2001] FCA 729
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the court had to address were whether the Minister's decision was lawful, rational, and based on appropriate considerations. Specifically, the court examined whether the Minister's conclusion that Li's intentions were not genuine was supported by the evidence and whether the decision-making process complied with the relevant statutory and common law requirements. The applicant argued that the Minister's decision was flawed, contending that it was based on an incorrect interpretation of the evidence and that it failed to take into account relevant factors.
The Federal Court held that the Minister's decision was lawful and correctly made. The court found that the Minister's assessment of Li's genuineness was supported by the evidence and that the decision-making process was free from jurisdictional error. The court emphasised the importance of the decision-maker's discretion in assessing the credibility of the applicant's evidence and intentions. It held that the Minister's conclusion was rational and that the decision was based on a proper consideration of the relevant factors. The court rejected the applicant's arguments and upheld the Minister's decision, dismissing the application for judicial review. Consequently, the court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: WHITLAM J
Full text does not contain this section.