Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 3)
Case
•
[2023] FCA 986
•22 August 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 3) [2023] FCA 986
[2023] FCA 986
22 August 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 3) involved a dispute between Mr Andrew Troy Leviston and PQ Management Pty Ltd concerning the valuation of Mr Leviston's 30% shareholding in Treated Waste Agencies Pty Ltd. The case was heard by the Federal Court of Australia, where the primary issue was the correct method to apply in valuing Mr Leviston's shares, specifically whether the capitalisation of future maintainable earnings method was appropriately applied.
The court examined the valuation report prepared by Mr Ashby, which proposed a capitalisation multiple of 3.00. The defence challenged the methodology, arguing that the expert placed undue weight on certain data points and failed to correctly apply accounting standards. The court found that Mr Ashby's conclusions were well-founded, supported by his analysis of comparable businesses and transactions. The court rejected the argument that a different method, specifically a 2.2 times EBITDA calculation, should be applied, as it did not align with the appropriate factors considered by Mr Ashby.
Ultimately, the court upheld the valuation of $479,029 for Mr Leviston's 30% shareholding, with adjustments for specific deductions and interest. The court ordered that PQ Management Pty Ltd must pay this amount for the shares, with further calculations to be agreed upon by the parties or determined in a subsequent hearing. The court also reserved the matter of costs for later determination.
The court examined the valuation report prepared by Mr Ashby, which proposed a capitalisation multiple of 3.00. The defence challenged the methodology, arguing that the expert placed undue weight on certain data points and failed to correctly apply accounting standards. The court found that Mr Ashby's conclusions were well-founded, supported by his analysis of comparable businesses and transactions. The court rejected the argument that a different method, specifically a 2.2 times EBITDA calculation, should be applied, as it did not align with the appropriate factors considered by Mr Ashby.
Ultimately, the court upheld the valuation of $479,029 for Mr Leviston's 30% shareholding, with adjustments for specific deductions and interest. The court ordered that PQ Management Pty Ltd must pay this amount for the shares, with further calculations to be agreed upon by the parties or determined in a subsequent hearing. The court also reserved the matter of costs for later determination.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Expert Evidence
-
Valuation of Shareholding
-
Capitalisation of Future Maintainable Earnings Method
-
Admissibility of Evidence
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Dixon (Liquidator), in the matter of Victoria Project Pty Ltd v Austhome Group Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] FCA 1076
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Dixon (Liquidator), in the matter of Victoria Project Pty Ltd v Austhome Group Pty Ltd (No 3)
[2025] FCA 1076
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 4)
[2023] FCA 1524
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
2
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd
[2022] FCA 787
Leviston v PQ Management Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2023] FCA 295
Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 4)
[2014] FCA 1291