Levi Strauss & Co v Harson International Limited
Case
•
[1999] ATMO 126
•22 December 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Levi Strauss & Co v Harson International Limited [1999] ATMO 126
[1999] ATMO 126
22 December 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Levi Strauss & Co (the applicant) sought to register the trade mark "501" in relation to clothing. Harson International Limited (the respondent) opposed this registration. The matter came before the Australian Trade Marks Office.
The primary legal issue for determination was whether the trade mark "501" was inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from the goods of other persons. The respondent argued that "501" was a common numerical designation and therefore not distinctive.
The hearing officer considered the evidence presented by both parties. The applicant provided extensive evidence demonstrating that "501" had acquired distinctiveness through extensive use and promotion in relation to their jeans. This evidence included sales figures, advertising expenditure, and consumer surveys. The hearing officer found that, despite the numerical nature of the mark, the applicant had successfully established that "501" had become distinctive of their goods in the minds of the relevant public.
The opposition was therefore dismissed, and the trade mark "501" was allowed to proceed to registration.
The primary legal issue for determination was whether the trade mark "501" was inherently adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from the goods of other persons. The respondent argued that "501" was a common numerical designation and therefore not distinctive.
The hearing officer considered the evidence presented by both parties. The applicant provided extensive evidence demonstrating that "501" had acquired distinctiveness through extensive use and promotion in relation to their jeans. This evidence included sales figures, advertising expenditure, and consumer surveys. The hearing officer found that, despite the numerical nature of the mark, the applicant had successfully established that "501" had become distinctive of their goods in the minds of the relevant public.
The opposition was therefore dismissed, and the trade mark "501" was allowed to proceed to registration.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Breach
-
Damages
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
I Can't Believe It's Yogurt Ltd v Unilever Plc [2001] ATMO 120
Cases Citing This Decision
3
McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd v Darryl Murray Cousins, Adrienne Mary Cousins, Neil Stuart Smith & Joan Smith
[2005] ATMO 24
Abbott Laboratories v Perkin Elmer Corporation
[2002] ATMO 101
I Can't Believe It's Yogurt Ltd v Unilever Plc
[2001] ATMO 120
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0