Leverton v Predny
Case
•
[2024] NSWSC 1638
•19 December 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Leverton v Predny [2024] NSWSC 1638
[2024] NSWSC 1638
19 December 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of Leverton v Predny involved a dispute between two adult children, the plaintiffs, and the estate of their deceased father, the defendant. The plaintiffs contended that their father had not made adequate and proper provision for them in his will. They sought an order for the court to make provision for them. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland, which had jurisdiction to hear family provision claims under the Family Provision Act 1969 (Qld).
The court was tasked with determining whether the father had failed to make adequate and proper provision for the plaintiffs and, if so, what provision should be made for them. The court considered the provisions of the Family Provision Act, which allows the court to make orders for the benefit of a person who has been inadequately provided for in a deceased person’s will. The court also considered the relevant common law principles that apply in determining whether provision has been made for a beneficiary. The court had to assess the nature and quantum of the provision to be made for the plaintiffs, taking into account the relevant statutory and common law principles.
The court found that the father had not made adequate and proper provision for the plaintiffs. It determined that the plaintiffs were in need of financial support and that the father had failed to make proper provision for them. The court considered the financial circumstances of the plaintiffs and the estate, as well as the relationship between the father and the plaintiffs. It made an order that the plaintiffs were to receive a sum of money from the estate. The court also made orders for the costs of the proceedings.
The court was tasked with determining whether the father had failed to make adequate and proper provision for the plaintiffs and, if so, what provision should be made for them. The court considered the provisions of the Family Provision Act, which allows the court to make orders for the benefit of a person who has been inadequately provided for in a deceased person’s will. The court also considered the relevant common law principles that apply in determining whether provision has been made for a beneficiary. The court had to assess the nature and quantum of the provision to be made for the plaintiffs, taking into account the relevant statutory and common law principles.
The court found that the father had not made adequate and proper provision for the plaintiffs. It determined that the plaintiffs were in need of financial support and that the father had failed to make proper provision for them. The court considered the financial circumstances of the plaintiffs and the estate, as well as the relationship between the father and the plaintiffs. It made an order that the plaintiffs were to receive a sum of money from the estate. The court also made orders for the costs of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Succession Law
Legal Concepts
-
Family Provision
-
Adequate Provision
-
Quantum of Provision
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Leverton v Predny [2024] NSWSC 1638
Most Recent Citation
Girotto v Girotto [2025] NSWSC 616
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Salmon v Albarran
[2025] NSWCA 42
Girotto v Girotto
[2025] NSWSC 616
Salmon v Albarran
[2025] NSWCA 42
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
2
Bassett v Bassett
[2021] NSWCA 320
Burke v Burke
[2015] NSWCA 195
Estate MPS, deceased
[2017] NSWSC 482