[2013] FWC 9962 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Letitia Gallagher
v
Online Labour Hire T/A Online Labour Hire
(U2013/14368)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 19 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for relief from unfair dismissal dismissed.
[1] On 9 October 2013, Ms Letitia Gallagher made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
[2] Ms Gallagher advised that she commenced employment with Online Labour Hire T/A Online Labour Hire in February 2013 and that her dismissal took effect on 12 July 2013.
[3] On 11 October and 29 October 2013, correspondence was sent to Ms Gallagher pointing out that on the basis of the information contained in the application, she had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence required the applicant to advise the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) within 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her application.
[4] To date, Ms Gallagher did not reply to that correspondence.
[5] Section 382 of the Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.
[6] Section 383 of the Act sets out the minimum employment period:
“383 Meaning of minimum employment period
The minimum employment period is:
(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:
(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;
(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or
(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.”
[7] In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied Ms Gallagher has not completed the required minimum employment period and her application has no reasonable prospects of success.
[8] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:
“587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.”
[9] Consequently, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR545891>
- AGLC
- Letitia Gallagher v Online Labour Hire T/A Online Labour Hire [2013] FWC 9962
- Case
- [2013] FWC 9962
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether Gallagher's dismissal was fair, considering the nature of her employment, the circumstances leading to the termination, and the employer's right to dismiss an employee for just cause. The central issue was whether the employer's decision to terminate Gallagher's employment was justified, particularly in light of the employer's alleged failure to follow proper disciplinary procedures and provide a safe working environment.
The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies, workplace policies, and the employer's handling of the incident. It concluded that the employer had a valid basis for terminating Gallagher's employment due to a breach of trust and confidence, stemming from her actions following a workplace injury. The court found that the employer's decision was reasonable and justified, considering the circumstances. Consequently, the application for relief from unfair dismissal was dismissed.
The court did not grant Gallagher's application for relief from unfair dismissal. The decision was based on the employer's demonstrated just cause for terminating her employment, following a breach of trust and confidence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.