Leong v AAI Limited t/as GIO

Case [2022] NSWPIC 262


CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

Citation:

Leong v AAI Limited t/as GIO [2022] NSWPIC 262

Claimant: Chiaw Wei Leong
insurer: AAI Limited t/as GIO
Member: Terence O'Riain
DATE OF DECISION: 30 May 2022
CATCHWORDS:

MOTOR ACCIDENTS - section 4.4 Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017; minor injury; application for assessment of damages made before medical dispute regarding minor injury assessed; no entitlement to damages once minor injury confirmed; dismissal of application to assess damages; Commission has no jurisdiction to make a decision regarding damages; dismissed under section 54 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 and rule 77(b)(iv) Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021; Held- application to assess damages dismissed. 

determinations made:

1.    All of the claimant’s injuries have been assessed as minor and thus damages cannot be awarded under section 3.40 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (the MAI Act).

2.    This damages assessment application cannot proceed as there is no jurisdiction and is dismissed.

Background

  1. The insurer’s informed the Commission[1] that the claimant has not advised whether a review application will be lodged, noting the claimant will need to satisfy the requirements under section 7.26 of the Act for any review application to be successful.

    [1] R1

  2. As of this date the claimant has not lodged any review or instructed other solicitors.

  3. The Commission has contacted the claimant via the Dispute Officer with charge of this application and she is aware of these proceedings.

  4. As the claim cannot proceed to an award of damages this current application is to be dismissed on the grounds that there is no jurisdiction for the matter to proceed.

Documents considered

  1. I have considered the documents provided in the application and the reply and any further information provided by the parties.

REASONS

  1. The powers to dismiss proceedings in the Commission are prescribed at section 54 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (the PIC Act) and rule 77 of the Personal Injury Commission Rules (the Rules).[2]

    [2] 77   Dismissal of proceedings
  2. The Commission does not have the power to dismiss the application unless it falls within one of the listed items.

  3. No damages can be awarded to a claimant if the only injuries suffered are minor injuries as defined under the MAI Act.

  4. In this case the Commission has no jurisdiction to make a decision regarding damages for Ms Leong due to Assessor Homes’ findings, which are currently unchallenged.

10.The current application for assessment of damages must be dismissed pursuant to rule 77(b)(iv) because the Commission has no jurisdiction to assess damages in this case.

GENERAL DIRECTIONS

11.The timetable in the directions made 24 March 2022 is vacated.

12.The claimant’s application for the assessment of damages filed with the Commission on 2 March 2022 is dismissed.

13.The parties made no submissions as to costs.

14.The claimant is not entitled to costs in respect of the application.



The following grounds are specified for section 54(c) of the PIC Act—
(a)  for proceedings by an application made under the workers compensation legislation—the applicant has failed to prosecute the proceedings with due despatch,
(b)  for proceedings by an application made under the motor accidents legislation—
(i)  if the application relates to a medical assessment—the application is not likely to be ready for determination within the next 6 months, or
(ii)  the applicant has failed, without reasonable excuse, to comply with a direction given by the Commission or the President, or
(iii)  the applicant has failed to prosecute the proceedings with due despatch, or
(iv)  there is no jurisdiction to determine the dispute to which the application relates, or
(v)  the application is being used for an improper purpose or is otherwise an abuse of process, or
(vi)  the application was made by a person who died after the application was made, unless the Commission has been provided with a copy of the grant of probate or letters of administration for the person’s estate and is satisfied that the estate is seeking to pursue the application.
Note—
Section 54 of the PIC Act provides that the Commission may at any stage dismiss proceedings before it—
(a)  if it is satisfied that the proceedings have been abandoned, or
(b)  if it is satisfied that the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious or otherwise misconceived or lacking in substance, or
(c)  for any other ground of dismissal specified in the Commission rules.
Section 54 of the PIC Act also applies to medical assessment proceedings, merit review proceedings and panel review proceedings. See rules 107, 114 and 127.

Details
AGLC
Leong v AAI Limited t/as GIO [2022] NSWPIC 262
Case
[2022] NSWPIC 262
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Leong v AAI Limited t/as GIO involved a dispute concerning damages for minor injuries sustained in a motor accident. The matter was heard in the Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales, where the applicant sought an assessment of damages under the Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017. The respondent, AAI Limited trading as GIO, opposed the application on the basis that the applicant had not yet resolved the dispute regarding the classification of the injury as minor. The Commission was required to determine whether it had jurisdiction to assess damages in the absence of a final determination on the minor injury status.

The central legal issue was whether the Commission had the authority to assess damages when there remained an unresolved medical dispute about the nature of the injuries. Specifically, the court needed to address whether an application for damages could proceed before the medical dispute regarding the classification of the injury as minor was settled. Under section 4.4 of the Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017, the entitlement to damages is contingent upon the classification of the injury, with distinct procedures for minor and more severe injuries. The Commission needed to ascertain whether it could exercise jurisdiction in such circumstances and whether the absence of a final determination on the minor injury status precluded it from making a decision on damages.

The Personal Injury Commission dismissed the applicant's application to assess damages. The Commission held that, under the Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017, it lacked the jurisdiction to make a decision regarding damages once it was confirmed that the injury was minor. The Commission reasoned that the statutory framework required the medical dispute concerning the nature of the injury to be resolved before any assessment of damages could be made. As the medical dispute remained unresolved, the Commission was unable to proceed with the assessment of damages. Consequently, the application was dismissed under section 54 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 and rule 77(b)(iv) of the Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021. The court's decision underscored the importance of resolving the medical dispute about the injury classification before any damages assessment can be undertaken.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.