Leif Quinton Cruickshank v Daniela Radojicic
Case
•
[2015] NSWDC 312
•17 December 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Leif Quinton Cruickshank v Daniela Radojicic [2015] NSWDC 312
[2015] NSWDC 312
17 December 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Leif Quinton Cruickshank, the plaintiff, brought a claim against Daniela Radojicic, the defendant, following a motor vehicle accident in which the plaintiff, a skateboard rider, was injured. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant, who was driving a vehicle, was negligent and that her negligence caused the accident and the subsequent injuries. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The central issues the court had to decide were whether the defendant was negligent, the extent of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence, and the appropriate apportionment of liability between the parties. The court also had to determine the quantum of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff.
The court found that the defendant was negligent in that she failed to give way to the plaintiff who was riding a skateboard on a road. It was determined that the plaintiff also contributed to the accident by not wearing a helmet and by riding his skateboard on a road rather than a designated path. The court apportioned 60% of the liability to the defendant and 40% to the plaintiff. In assessing the damages, the court considered the severity and impact of the plaintiff’s injuries, his loss of earning capacity, and the costs of future medical care. The court awarded the plaintiff $905,773 in damages, reflecting the apportionment of liability.
The court ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis up to a certain date and on an indemnity basis thereafter. It also directed that the exhibits be retained for 28 days. The court’s detailed reasons for the judgment, including the basis for the apportionment of liability and the assessment of damages, were published.
The court found that the defendant was negligent in that she failed to give way to the plaintiff who was riding a skateboard on a road. It was determined that the plaintiff also contributed to the accident by not wearing a helmet and by riding his skateboard on a road rather than a designated path. The court apportioned 60% of the liability to the defendant and 40% to the plaintiff. In assessing the damages, the court considered the severity and impact of the plaintiff’s injuries, his loss of earning capacity, and the costs of future medical care. The court awarded the plaintiff $905,773 in damages, reflecting the apportionment of liability.
The court ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis up to a certain date and on an indemnity basis thereafter. It also directed that the exhibits be retained for 28 days. The court’s detailed reasons for the judgment, including the basis for the apportionment of liability and the assessment of damages, were published.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Personal Injury
-
Contributory Negligence
-
Apportionment of Liability
-
Assessment of Damages
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
1
Pennington v Norris
[1956] HCA 26
Podbrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd
[1985] HCA 34
T and X Company Pty Ltd v Chivas
[2014] NSWCA 235