Legrand Australia Pty Limited

Case [2025] FWCA 1405


[2025] FWCA 1405

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Legrand Australia Pty Limited

(AG2025/934)

LEGRAND AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS

SYDNEY, 30 APRIL 2025

Application for approval of the Legrand Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Legrand Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Legrand Australia Pty Limited (Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The material filed in support of the application disclosed a discrepancy between the title of the Agreement and title of the proposed agreement referred to in the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) which was issued to employees. The discrepancy was the omission of the letters “Pty Ltd” after the company name where reference is made to the title of the proposed agreement in the NERR. The Applicant submitted that the employees were unlikely to have been disadvantaged by the error particularly given that the NERR refers to the full name of the company as the entity giving the notice. I accept that submission and am of the view that the discrepancy is a minor technical error which, in accordance with s.188(5) of the Act, I am able to disregard where I am satisfied that employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. I propose to disregard the error on that basis.

  1. A concern was also raised with the Applicant as to whether employees had a reasonable opportunity to consider the proposed agreement before voting on it given that the Agreement which was originally provided to employees on 10 March 2025 was provided again with an amendment correcting a typographical error in clause 3.7 on 12 March 2025. Notwithstanding that voting on the Agreement commenced on 19 March 2025, having regard to the explanation provided by the Applicant, which was not disputed by the  “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), a bargaining representative for the Agreement, I am satisfied that the employees had a reasonable opportunity to consider the proposed enterprise agreement before voting on it, so that they could vote in an informed manner in accordance with paragraph 4 of the Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

  1. The Applicant has provided a written undertaking (Annexure A). In accordance with s.190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought in relation to the undertaking. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Having regard to the supporting material and the undertaking referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as is relevant to this application for approval has been met. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I note that Clause 1.4 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement will be read and interpreted in conjunction with the National Employment Standards (Standards) and that where there is an inconsistency between this agreement and the Standards, and the Standards provides a greater benefit, the Standards provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency.

  1. The AMWU lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the AMWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 September 2027.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528816  PR786525>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Legrand Australia Pty Limited [2025] FWCA 1405
Case
[2025] FWCA 1405
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application for approval of the Legrand Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) was the court tasked with determining whether the agreement should be approved. The dispute centred on the terms and conditions of employment as outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement between Legrand Australia Pty Ltd and its employees.

The legal issues before the FWC were whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly focusing on whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable terms of employment. The FWC was required to assess whether the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits for employees, and whether it met the requirements for being a "better off overall test" (BOOT) for employees.

The FWC found that the Legrand Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 was fair and reasonable, and met the BOOT requirement. The FWC considered that the agreement provided appropriate safeguards for employees and offered a fair balance between the interests of the employer and the employees. The FWC approved the agreement, noting that it provided for a comprehensive set of terms and conditions that were satisfactory in all respects. The court did not identify any provisions that would render the agreement unfair or unreasonable.

The FWC approved the Legrand Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025. The approval was based on the conclusion that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms of employment and met the BOOT requirement. The agreement was thus deemed to be in the best interests of the employees and was authorised for implementation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.