Legal Practice Board v Said
Case
•
[2002] WASC 35
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Legal Practice Board v Said [2002] WASC 35
[2002] WASC 35
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Legal Practice Board brought proceedings against Michael Nassib Said for contempt of court, alleging that Said had engaged in activities that constituted acting as a solicitor in breach of the Legal Practitioners' Act 1893 (WA). The Board alleged that Said, not being a legal practitioner, had drawn and prepared 16 documents on behalf of his brother Raymond Said in a District Court action. The application was brought pursuant to s 81 of the Act. The court found that Said was guilty of contempt in respect of the chamber summons dated 11 March 1998, which he had drawn, prepared and filed. The court held that Said's conduct in this regard contravened both s 76(1) and s 77(1) of the Act. The court did not find that Said had contravened the Act in relation to the other 15 documents. The court will hear the parties on the question of penalty and costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Administrative Penalties
-
Professional Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Legal Practice Board of Western Australia v Fazio [2018] WASC 147
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Dean v Legal Practice Board
[2016] WASCA 63
Legal Practice Board of Western Australia v Fazio
[2018] WASC 147
Dean v Legal Practice Board
[2015] WASC 260
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Legal Practice Board v Adams
[2001] WASC 78
Legal Practice Board v Adams
[2001] WASC 78