Ledarn and Ledarn
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 1107
•2 December 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ledarn and Ledarn [2010] FamCA 1107
[2010] FamCA 1107
2 December 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Ledarn and Ledarn*, Justice Cronin of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the wife filed on 21 September 2010, and a response thereto filed by the husband on 9 November 2010. The dispute concerned matters arising between the parties.
The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the initiating application and the response, including whether to refer the matter for conciliation and what interim orders, if any, should be made concerning the parties' presence at a particular property. The court also had to consider the dismissal of various applications and responses filed by both parties.
Justice Cronin ordered that the hearing scheduled for 23 February 2011 be vacated. The initiating application and the response were referred to the Co-ordinating Registrar for the appointment of a conciliation conference. Interim orders were made restraining both the wife and the husband from being on the premises at S2 during specific hours each day, unless otherwise agreed. Furthermore, the court dismissed the applications in a case filed by the husband and the wife, along with their respective responses. Each party was granted liberty to apply on short notice for further orders.
The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the initiating application and the response, including whether to refer the matter for conciliation and what interim orders, if any, should be made concerning the parties' presence at a particular property. The court also had to consider the dismissal of various applications and responses filed by both parties.
Justice Cronin ordered that the hearing scheduled for 23 February 2011 be vacated. The initiating application and the response were referred to the Co-ordinating Registrar for the appointment of a conciliation conference. Interim orders were made restraining both the wife and the husband from being on the premises at S2 during specific hours each day, unless otherwise agreed. Furthermore, the court dismissed the applications in a case filed by the husband and the wife, along with their respective responses. Each party was granted liberty to apply on short notice for further orders.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Ledarn and Ledarn [2010] FamCA 1107
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Bar-Mordecai v Rotman
[2000] NSWCA 123
S & S
[2002] FamCA 59